1RM Back Squat Calculator — Estimate Your Max (Epley Formula)
Enter weight and reps to instantly estimate your back squat 1-rep max using the Epley formula. Includes a %1RM table and strength standards for novice to elite lifters.
- Data verified · June 2026
- Edited by Martín Rodríguez
- Formula verified by automated tests
- Private — runs on your device
See step-by-step calculation
See this calculation step by step
See period-by-period detail
How to use this calculator
Follow this tool’s steps, then review its formula, assumptions, and limits below.
1RM = w × (1 + r/30), the same predictor used by Wendler's 5/3/1, Sheiko templates, and most coach spreadsheets. Two other equations get cited a lot: Brzycki (w × 36/(37 − r)), which trims a couple of pounds off Epley and tends to match true singles better at 6+ reps, and Lombardi (w × r^0.10), which overshoots once you push past 8. None of these care whether you squat high-bar Olympic style or low-bar powerlifting — but your numbers will. Low-bar usually moves 5–12% more weight than high-bar for a trained lifter, so plug in whichever stance you actually compete in. For reference points: ExRx and Stronger by Science strength standards put a novice male squat (200 lb bodyweight) around 230 lb, an intermediate lifter around 315 lb, advanced around 405 lb, and elite/competitive at 500 lb+. For women at 145 lb bodyweight, those bands run roughly 125 / 175 / 235 / 290 lb. Use the calculator to set your next training cycle without having to grind a true single under a bar that hates you.When to use this calculator
- Picking USAPL or USPA meet attempts from training PRs — opener at 90–92% of your estimated 1RM (e.g., 405 lb predicted → 365 lb opener), second at 96–98% (390 lb), third at 100–103% (405–415 lb) so you don't bomb out on squat
- Setting your training max (TM) for Wendler 5/3/1 — Jim's rule is TM = 85–90% of estimated 1RM, so a 500 lb predicted squat runs the cycle off a 425–450 lb TM (Week 3 top set: 95% TM = 405–428 lb × 1+ AMRAP)
- Running a peak strength block at 85–95% 1RM (heavy doubles and singles in the 4 weeks before a meet) without a true max test eating recovery you don't have
- Programming a hypertrophy phase at 65–75% 1RM for 8–12 rep sets — e.g., 405 lb 1RM → 265–305 lb working sets for 4×10 quad-focused volume
- Sanity-checking a recent paused squat PR — if you grind out 315 × 5 paused, that's a ~365 lb paused 1RM; comparing it to your touch-and-go 1RM tells you how much your stretch reflex is buying you
- Tracking Bulgarian-method daily max work — re-estimating projected 1RM weekly from your daily top single + back-off rep work, so you can spot stagnation before it becomes overreaching
1RM Prediction Formulas Compared — 100 kg × 5 Reps Example
| Formula | Equation | Result (100 kg × 5 reps) | Best accuracy range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epley (1985) | w × (1 + r/30) | 116.7 kg | 1–10 reps |
| Brzycki (1993) | w × 36 / (37 − r) | 112.5 kg | 6+ reps (more conservative) |
| Lombardi (1989) | w × r^0.10 | 117.5 kg | 1–8 reps (overshoots >8) |
| O'Conner (1989) | w × (1 + 0.025r) | 112.5 kg | 1–10 reps |
Fuente: Mayhew et al. (1992) / Reynolds et al. (2006) vía PubMed; fórmulas y resultados verificados contra el contenido de la calculadora.
How it works
The Math — Epley, Brzycki, Lombardi Compared
All three formulas take the same two inputs (weight on the bar, reps completed at or near failure) and predict a 1-rep max. They disagree most at high reps:
Epley (1985): 1RM = w × (1 + r/30)
Brzycki (1993): 1RM = w × 36 / (37 − r)
Lombardi(1989): 1RM = w × r^0.10
O'Conner(1989): 1RM = w × (1 + 0.025r)Worked example — 100 kg × 5 reps:
Epley : 100 × (1 + 5/30) = 100 × 1.167 = 116.7 kg
Brzycki : 100 × 36/(37 − 5) = 100 × 1.125 = 112.5 kg
Lombardi: 100 × 5^0.10 = 100 × 1.175 = 117.5 kg
O'Conner: 100 × (1 + 0.125) = 100 × 1.125 = 112.5 kgThe spread (~5 kg) is normal. For 3–5 rep sets the formulas converge within 2–3%. Above 8 reps, Lombardi overshoots by 5–10% and Brzycki tends to be more accurate.
Common Squat Weights by Rep Count (100 kg 1RM)
Use this reference table if your 1RM is near 100 kg. Scale proportionally.
| Reps | Epley 1RM | % of 1RM | Training goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 kg | 100% | Max single / competition |
| 2 | 106.7 kg | 95% | Peaking, heavy doubles |
| 3 | 110 kg | 92.5% | Strength triples |
| 5 | 116.7 kg | 85% | Strength 5/3/1 top set |
| 6 | 120 kg | 83% | Strength-hypertrophy crossover |
| 8 | 126.7 kg | 79% | Hypertrophy working sets |
| 10 | 133.3 kg | 75% | Volume hypertrophy |
| 12 | 140 kg | 71% | High-rep hypertrophy |
%1RM / Reps Reference Table
Useful for plugging into 5/3/1, Sheiko, Conjugate, or any percentage-based template:
| % of 1RM | RPE | Typical Reps | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | RPE 10 — true max | 1 | Competition / test |
| 95% | RPE 9 | 2 | Peaking singles |
| 90% | RPE 8 | 3–4 | Heavy strength |
| 85% | RPE 7 | 5–6 | 5/3/1 top sets |
| 80% | RPE 6.5 | 6–8 | Strength-hypertrophy |
| 75% | RPE 6 | 8–10 | Volume / hypertrophy |
| 70% | RPE 5 | 10–12 | Hypertrophy block |
| 65% | RPE 4 | 12–15 | Endurance / warm-up |
Squat Strength Standards (back squat, kg, by training level)
| Level | 70 kg BW | 80 kg BW | 90 kg BW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beginner | 60–80 kg | 70–95 kg | 80–105 kg |
| Novice | 80–100 kg | 95–115 kg | 105–130 kg |
| Intermediate | 100–130 kg | 115–145 kg | 130–165 kg |
| Advanced | 150–185 kg | 175–210 kg | 195–235 kg |
| Elite (competitive) | 200+ kg | 230+ kg | 260+ kg |
(Source: ExRx.net, Stronger by Science, StrengthLevel)
Bar Position Changes The Number
A high-bar (Olympic) squat and a low-bar (powerlifting) squat produce different 1RMs from the same athlete:
Depth Standards
| Standard | Definition | Where |
|---|---|---|
| Parallel | Top of knee level with hip crease | USAPL, USPA, IPF |
| Full depth (ATG) | Hip well below knee, hamstrings on calves | Olympic weightlifting, CrossFit |
| High squat | Hip above knee | Gym only — red-lighted in meets |
Programming Your 1RM Number
Wendler 5/3/1: runs every cycle off a Training Max (TM) = 85–90% of estimated 1RM. Week 3 top set is 95% TM × 1+ AMRAP. You re-estimate 1RM each cycle from that AMRAP.
Sheiko #29/#32: squat days run at 70–85% 1RM for sets of 2–5 reps. Total reps per session at >70% can exceed 30 — accurate 1RM matters a lot.
Bulgarian method: requires a daily heavy single. Back-off sets run at 85–90% of the day's top single.
Smolov base cycle: 4 squat sessions/week, percentages built off a fresh 1RM. Plug a stale or inflated 1RM into Smolov and you'll quit by Week 2.
Common Errors
1. AMRAP wasn't actually AMRAP. If you stop a top set with 2–3 reps in reserve, Epley underpredicts your max. Push the set to where the next rep would have failed.
2. No spotter or safeties. Set the safeties at the bottom of your squat, use a power rack. If neither is available, cap the test at 5RM and trust the math.
3. High-rep test sets. Epley is most accurate at 1–6 reps. Above 10 reps, the formula overshoots by 10–15%.
4. Comparing across gear/bar position. A belted, sleeved low-bar squat can be 10–20 kg above an unbelted high-bar single. Tag your inputs with the gear used.
5. Testing too close to a meet. Don't test a true 1RM in the last 14 days before competition. Use a 3RM or 5RM at 4–6 weeks out.
Worked Example
Frequently asked questions
What's the Epley formula for 1RM and how accurate is it?
What's a strong back squat for a 200 lb man?
What's a strong squat for a woman at 145 lb bodyweight?
How often should I squat — once, twice, or more per week?
Why does my calculated 1RM feel too high when I actually try it?
What's the typical high-bar to low-bar squat ratio?
Should I test a true 1RM or trust the calculator?
How long does it take to recover after a max squat test?
Does the calculator work for paused squats and tempo squats?
What if I'm a beginner and don't know my top set?
Sources & references
- NSCA — Testing Maximum Strength (Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning)
- USA Powerlifting (USAPL) — Technical Rules Book
- Stronger by Science — How Accurate Are Estimated 1RMs? (Greg Nuckols)
- ExRx.net — Strength Standards by bodyweight and training age
- Mayhew et al. (1992) / Reynolds et al. (2006) — Validation of 1RM prediction equations
Methodology & trust
Sports calculator with its formula verified automatically against NSCA — Testing Maximum Strength (Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning), per our editorial policy and methodology.
Updated: June 2026. Parameters are verified periodically against the cited sources.
Calculations run 100% in your browser. We do not store or transmit your data.
Indicative results. For critical decisions, consult a professional.
Rodríguez, M. (2026). 1RM Back Squat Calculator — Estimate Your Max (Epley Formula). Hacé Cuentas. https://hacecuentas.com/en/1rm-squat-estimator
Content licensed under CC-BY 4.0 — reuse it citing the source with a link to Hacé Cuentas.