Carnot Cycle Efficiency
Calculate the maximum theoretical efficiency of a heat engine between two thermal reservoirs. Free, fast, and accurate.
- Data verified · June 2026
- Edited by Martín Rodríguez
- Private — runs on your device
See step-by-step calculation
When to use this calculator
- Evaluating the theoretical maximum efficiency of a coal-fired power plant operating with steam at 565°C (838 K) and a condenser at 45°C (318 K), giving η ≈ 62%.
- Comparing the ideal efficiency limit of a gasoline engine (combustion ~2300 K, exhaust ~700 K → η ≈ 70%) against its real-world ~25–30% brake thermal efficiency.
- Designing a geothermal power plant where the hot reservoir is 180°C (453 K) and ambient rejection is 25°C (298 K), yielding a Carnot cap of ~34%.
- Benchmarking a combined-cycle natural gas plant (hot side ~1600 K, cold side ~305 K) against its Carnot limit of ~81% to assess engineering losses.
Carnot Efficiency Limits for Real-World Energy Systems
| Power system | T_hot (K) | T_cold (K) | Carnot η (%) | Typical real η (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuclear power plant (PWR) | 600 | 305 | 49% | 33–37% |
| Coal-fired steam turbine | 838 | 318 | 62% | 38–45% |
| Combined-cycle gas turbine | 1,600 | 305 | 81% | 55–62% |
| Gasoline engine (Otto cycle) | 2,300 | 700 | 70% | 25–30% |
| Geothermal plant (low-grade) | 453 | 298 | 34% | 10–18% |
| Solar thermal parabolic trough | 673 | 303 | 55% | 14–20% |
| Ocean thermal (OTEC) | 300 | 277 | 7.7% | 1–3% |
Source: U.S. Department of Energy — Thermodynamic Cycles and Power Plant Efficiency; NIST Chemistry WebBook. Real efficiency is always below Carnot η due to friction, turbulence, and heat leakage. Formula: η = 1 − (T_cold / T_hot), temperatures in Kelvin.
How it works
How It Is Calculated
The Carnot efficiency formula is derived from the Second Law of Thermodynamics and defines the absolute upper bound for any heat engine operating between a hot reservoir at temperature T_hot and a cold reservoir at T_cold, both in Kelvin:
η_Carnot = 1 − (T_cold / T_hot)
Where:
η_Carnot = Carnot efficiency (dimensionless, 0 to 1)
T_cold = Temperature of the cold reservoir (Kelvin)
T_hot = Temperature of the hot reservoir (Kelvin)
Kelvin conversion: K = °C + 273.15 | K = (°F − 32) × 5/9 + 273.15
Example:
T_hot = 573 K (300°C), T_cold = 373 K (100°C)
η = 1 − (373 / 573) = 1 − 0.651 = 0.349 → 34.9%Critical requirement: T_hot > T_cold > 0 K. Using Celsius or Fahrenheit directly produces completely wrong results.
---
Reference Table
Typical Carnot efficiency limits for real-world energy systems (approximate operating temperatures):
| System | T_hot (K) | T_cold (K) | Carnot η (%) | Typical Real η (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuclear power plant (PWR) | 600 | 305 | 49% | 33–37% |
| Coal-fired steam turbine | 838 | 318 | 62% | 38–45% |
| Combined-cycle gas turbine | 1600 | 305 | 81% | 55–62% |
| Gasoline engine (Otto cycle) | 2300 | 700 | 70% | 25–30% |
| Geothermal plant (low-grade) | 453 | 298 | 34% | 10–18% |
| Solar thermal parabolic trough | 673 | 303 | 55% | 14–20% |
| Ocean thermal (OTEC) | 300 | 277 | 7.7% | 1–3% |
Real efficiency is always less than Carnot η due to irreversibilities (friction, turbulence, heat leakage).
---
Typical Cases
Case 1 — Steam Power Plant
A utility boiler produces steam at 300°C (573 K); the condenser operates at 100°C (373 K).
η = 1 − 373/573 = 34.9%This means that even under ideal (reversible) conditions, at most 34.9 cents of every dollar of heat input can be converted to work. The rest must be rejected to the cold reservoir.
Case 2 — Combined-Cycle Gas Turbine
Combustion gases enter at 1327°C (1600 K); waste heat is rejected at 32°C (305 K).
η = 1 − 305/1600 = 80.9%Real combined-cycle plants achieve ~57–62%, meaning they capture roughly 70–77% of the Carnot ideal — the best performance of any commercial thermal cycle.
Case 3 — Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC)
Surface seawater at 27°C (300 K) vs. deep-sea water at 4°C (277 K).
η = 1 − 277/300 = 7.7%The razor-thin temperature difference imposes a brutally low theoretical ceiling, which is why OTEC systems have very high capital cost per unit of electricity generated.
---
Common Errors
1. Using °C or °F instead of Kelvin. This is the most frequent mistake. Plugging in η = 1 − 100/300 (Celsius values) gives 66.7% — a grossly inflated and physically meaningless result. Always convert first: K = °C + 273.15.
2. Assuming real efficiency equals Carnot efficiency. Carnot efficiency is a theoretical maximum, not an achievable target. Real engines suffer from friction, non-ideal gas behavior, finite heat transfer rates, and turbulence — all of which reduce actual efficiency well below the Carnot ceiling.
3. Treating Carnot efficiency as a design specification. Engineers use it as a benchmark, not a goal. A steam turbine running at 60% of Carnot efficiency is considered excellent; expecting 95%+ of Carnot is physically unrealistic.
4. Ignoring that T_cold must be > 0 K. Setting T_cold = 0 K gives η = 100%, which is forbidden by the Third Law of Thermodynamics — absolute zero is unattainable, and a 100%-efficient heat engine would violate the Second Law.
5. Confusing heat pump COP with engine efficiency. A Carnot heat pump has COP = T_hot / (T_hot − T_cold), which can exceed 1 (and often reaches 3–6). This is not the same formula and should not be compared directly to engine efficiency.
---
Related Calculators
Explore other science and engineering calculators on Hacé Cuentas:
Calculation Example
Frequently asked questions
Why must temperatures be in Kelvin, not Celsius or Fahrenheit?
Can any real engine actually reach Carnot efficiency?
What happens to Carnot efficiency as T_cold approaches absolute zero?
How does Carnot efficiency apply to refrigerators and heat pumps?
Why is the Carnot efficiency of a nuclear power plant lower than a coal plant?
What is the significance of increasing T_hot vs. decreasing T_cold for improving efficiency?
Does the Carnot formula apply to non-ideal gases or phase-change cycles like steam?
How do I use Carnot efficiency to estimate wasted heat in a power plant?
Sources & references
Methodology & trust
Calculadora de ciencia revisada por el equipo editorial de Hacé Cuentas, contrastada con NIST – Thermodynamics and the Laws of Thermodynamics (NIST Chemistry WebBook), según nuestra política editorial y metodología.
Última revisión: June 20, 2026. Los parámetros se verifican periódicamente con las fuentes citadas.
Calculations run 100% in your browser. We do not store or transmit your data.
Indicative results. For critical decisions, consult a professional.
Rodríguez, M. (2026). Carnot Cycle Efficiency. Hacé Cuentas. https://hacecuentas.com/eficiencia-carnot-termodinamica
Contenido bajo licencia CC-BY 4.0 — reutilizable citando la fuente con enlace a Hacé Cuentas.